🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.