🔗 Share this article

Ten years following the UK entered into a hasty referendum that split the nation and triggered turmoil, a warning comes from across the Irish Sea: it may occur once more.

Authorities and electorate drifted into Brexit and the identical might transpire with a national vote on a united Ireland, sparking convulsions for which no one is ready.

That conveys the caution from two prominent commentators from each side of the Irish border who have joined forces to analyse the benefits and drawbacks of Northern Ireland exiting the UK to establish a fresh nation with the Republic of Ireland.

Administrative Institutions Ill-Equipped

Fintan O’Toole and Sam McBride, have concluded that the political establishments in Ireland and Britain are extremely ill-prepared for a possibly fraught and monumental referendum.

"The key takeaway of Brexit has gone unabsorbed, which is that stuff can arise suddenly and can gain traction swiftly," the commentator stated. "I would suggest that the institutional structure of our islands remains very unstable."

Book Publication Intends to Encourage Dialogue

The pair have studied the political, financial and societal rationales for any structural alteration in a book, The Case For and Against Unification, issued by the Dublin-based Royal Irish Academy.

They hope to provoke discussion on the topic with a tour of speaking events that will take them to Westminster in the coming weeks.

"What troubles everyone, or must worry every person, is the Brexit referendum of 2016," said the analyst.

"We should prevent a national vote on a binary, unclear proposal whose results have not been spelled out because then you end up with an extraordinarily polarised community where people who have lost are resistant to defeat and the people who have won lack clarity quite what it is that they have gained."

Constitutional Provision

Under the Good Friday agreement, the Northern Ireland government minister is obliged to schedule a referendum on Irish unification if it appears likely that a most voters would approve.

Nationalist parties and other pro-unification groups claim this point is approaching, and a non-profit named pro-unification advocates has built momentum, but both governments and unionists minimise the prospect, leaving it unclear when or if there might be a national vote.

Absence of Serious Debate

Ideological statements supporting and opposing unification has masked the lack of substantive discussion, said McBride.

"Individuals are often supportive or opposed the concept but the concrete planning which might go beyond that to make it possible has largely not occurred. A great deal has taken place in scholarly circles but very few elected officials or activists are willing to participate with the basics. As an example, what type of nation should be desired? Unitary? Federal?"

Publication's Method

In the book, neither author supports unification or the existing arrangement. Each composes two articles that seek impartiality in presenting the argument for a united Ireland and the case opposing it, marshalling economic and social statistics, past examples and governmental frameworks.

Discussions encompass flags and symbols, taxes, healthcare systems, elderly benefits, national debt responsibilities and the risk of unionist unrest. The objective is to inform and provoke dialogue.

"Considerable attention exists in the topic but there has not yet occurred a debate," commented the writer. "Discussion implies an recognition of the concept that there might be good arguments on either side."

Dual Referendums

A public vote in Northern Ireland would additionally cause one in the republic, where citizens report they favour unification but oppose increased taxation or adopting a different emblem to recognise unionists' UK heritage.

"Authorities in Dublin should determine what the offer from pro-unification movements is other than just saying: 'We desire a united Ireland and we love you'," remarked the commentator.

Possibility of Referendum

The journalist thinks a referendum in his era is possible and that it could happen suddenly. "You could have just a irresponsible or a poor or a negligent government minister who declares: 'Let us proceed and settle the matter.'"

Both nationalists and pro-UK supporters have plausible, justified arguments, he stated. "Somebody will succeed in this matter and the other side will eventually not succeed but all factions has possesses something to acquire from the other's viewpoints."

Request for Broader Debate

Westminster should engage with the dialogue, stated the analyst. "This involves the United Kingdom. It is a UK matter equally as it is an Irish issue."